Criddle v. State

Barnes, Presiding Judge.

William Gerald Criddle appeals his conviction of driving under the influence (DUI), arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because he was arrested outside the jurisdiction of the arresting officer. Because the trial court did not err in denying the motion, we affirm.

In ruling on a motion to suppress, the trial court acts as factfinder and may believe or disbelieve any testimonial evidence. State v. Rowell, 299 Ga. App. 238 (682 SE2d 343) (2009). We accept the trial court’s factual findings and consider the evidence on appeal in the light…