Shuman v. State

The defendants contend that the evidence did not authorize the verdict and was contrary to law. The evidence clearly authorized the jury to find the defendants guilty of the offense charged. In fact the defendants do not argue.in their brief in this court to the contrary, but their sole contention, as to the illegality of their conviction, is that the State failed to prove that the offense with which they were charged was committed in Bulloch County, as charged in the indictment, or even upon the line between it and another county and, therefore, failed to prove the venue.

It was urged by the…