Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Case v. RGA Insurance Services

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 8, 1999No. A99A0262Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAndrews, Presiding Judge

I agree the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Hanover, but not for the reasons stated in the majority’s opinion. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to RGA.

1. In Division 1, the majority ignores a long line of cases holding that the uncontroverted affidavit of the insurance company stating that it would not have issued the policy had the question on the application been answered truthfully is enough to sustain summary judgment. In Hanover’s motion for summary judgment, it claimed *6that due to a material…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stillson v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Liberty National Life Insurance v. HoukSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Jessup v. Franklin Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Davis v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. BEAVERS INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. RolandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API