Legal Opinion
Dale Huhmann v. Federal Express Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 2017No. 15-56744PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA, Circuit Judge:
We are called upon to decide to what benefits a returning service member is entitled when resuming a civilian career. The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) guarantees that an individual who departs for military service shall not be denied any “benefit of employment” due to that service. 38 U.S.C. § 4311(a). Dale Huhmann argues that, when he returned from service in the United States Air Force, FedEx Express (FedEx) improperly paid him a $7,400 bonus instead of the $17,700 bonus he would have earned had he not served. For the reasons…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Leon Belaustegui v. IlwuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Cazares v. City of El CentroDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Chisula Chambers v. University of Washington; Amy Haverland; Moriah Janke; and Marlowe RamirezDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Clarkson v. Alaska Airlines IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
- Claus v. Canyon County, IdahoDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.