Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1896No. 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon. Jesse Arthur, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of. the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

The motion of respondent to strike the statement of facts from the record was granted at the hearing, and the argument upon the merits confined to questions arising upon the pleadings. Two reasons were assigned why said motion should be granted, (1) that a copy of the proposed statement of facts had not been served upon the respondent after it was filed in the cause; and (2) that no notice of such filing had been served upon one of the parties who had appeared in the action.

It appeared from the transcript that a copy of the proposed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Erickson v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. North Bend Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Campbell v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Freshour v. SchuerenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Seattle Aerie No. 1 of Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Commissioner of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Sommer v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API