Legal Opinion
Ng Kam Fook v. Esperdy
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 2, 1963No. Nos. 368, 369, Dockets 27542, 28121PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ng Kam Fook (Fook) and plaintiff Au Tong (Tong) have joined in a consolidated appeal involving identical questions, from an order by Judge Metz-ner in each case, granting summary judgment in favor of the District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York District, in actions seeking to review the order of the Attorney General directing the deportation of Fook to Hong Kong and the deportation of Tong to the Netherlands.
The question involved in this appeal is the construction of the word “country” as used in Section 243(a) of the Immigration…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hauenstein v. LynhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States ex rel. Leong Choy Moon v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States v. Cheng Fu Sheng and Lin Fu MeiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Delany v. MoraitisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- LINNASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
- Milton Adolphus Farrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Waldemar Georg Sint v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Cheng v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- LAUBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.