Legal Opinion
Marvin Meister v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 12, 1963No. 54-62PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff is a commander in the United States Naval Reserve, attached in a pay status to the Naval Reserve Mobilization Team 3-8 which assembled for periodic training sessions at the U. S. Navy and Marine Corps Training Center, Freeport, New York.
On February 23, 1961, the executive officer of plaintiff’s mobilization team addressed a letter to all members of that unit containing the following instructions :
“1. On 8 March 1961 this Division is scheduled for the Third Naval District Annual Inspection.
“2. It is required that attendance be 100% to insure that all officers…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lemly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Ben v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1956
- Edwards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- De-Raef Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. William G. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Vason v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
- Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- Andrews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Marvin Meister v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963