Town of York v. McAlpin
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
TPIOMAS, Justice.
The suit in equity was for an injunction to require the abatement of a nuisance, and for damages as the result of said nuisance.
The trial was by the court on testimony given ore tenus. The presumption must be indulged in favor of the findings made by the court and carried into the decree. Andrews et al. v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 So. 62; Grayson v. George et al., 226 Ala. 106, 145 So. 427; Rogers v. McLeskey, 225 Ala. 148, 142 So. 526.
The authorities are to the effect that a nuisance such as is here complained of may be abated in a proper case, and damages ascertained and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- East & West Railroad Co. of Alabama v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Caples v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Nininger v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Ashurst v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Howell v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Coleman v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Cavin v. CavinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Campbell v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Lewis v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.