Legal Opinion

Town of York v. McAlpin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1936No. 2 Div. 70PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TPIOMAS, Justice.

The suit in equity was for an injunction to require the abatement of a nuisance, and for damages as the result of said nuisance.

The trial was by the court on testimony given ore tenus. The presumption must be indulged in favor of the findings made by the court and carried into the decree. Andrews et al. v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 So. 62; Grayson v. George et al., 226 Ala. 106, 145 So. 427; Rogers v. McLeskey, 225 Ala. 148, 142 So. 526.

The authorities are to the effect that a nuisance such as is here complained of may be abated in a proper case, and damages ascertained and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. East & West Railroad Co. of Alabama v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Caples v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Nininger v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Ashurst v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howell v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Coleman v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Cavin v. CavinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Campbell v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Lewis v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API