Mercer v. North Little Rock Special School District
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). It appears from the statement of .facts, which need not be repeated here, that the school district advertised and sold the bonds with the following: “said bonds to be offered unconditionally.” The bonds were sold unconditionally, and E. M. Ream & Company became the purchaser thereof. The record shows that the bid of the American Southern Trust Company for the bonds was $8,617.60 higher than the bid of E. M. Ream & Company, and that the bid of Brown-Crummer Company was $39,304.70 higher than the bid of E. M. Ream & Company. Hence, it is insisted that one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. Bank of Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Casey v. Independence CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Trowbridge v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1898
- Grant County Bank v. McClellanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Freeman Holdings of Ark., LLC v. FNBC Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019