Legal Opinion

In Re Kiberu

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2008No. 07-0959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case may involve potential healthcare liability claims. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code ch. 74. The trial court authorized presuit depositions pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202. The court of appeals denied mandamus relief. 237 S.W.3d 445. Without hearing oral argument, see Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus, and direct the court of appeals to withdraw its previous opinion and reconsider relators’ petition in light of In re Jorden, 249 S.W.3d 416 (Tex.2008). We are confident the court will comply with our directive, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re KiberuCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In RE COMMITMENT OF TIMOTHY DANIEL RENSHAW v. the State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2023
  2. in Re Simon Kiberu and Harris Methodist H-E-B Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  3. in Re Simon Kiberu and Harris Methodist H-E-B Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  4. in Re Simon Kiberu and Harris Methodist H-E-B Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API