Legal Opinion
(PS) Tucker v. McBrien
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 28, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00526Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DYLAN J. TUCKER, et al., No. 2:23-cv-00526 DAD CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PETER McBRIEN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Dylan J. Tucker proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under
42 U.S.C. § 19
1983. (ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21), this matter is before the undersigned for 20 the purpose of these findings and recommendations to the assigned district judge. See
28 U.S.C. § 21
636(b)(1).1 22 Two motions to dismiss filed by the defendants are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.