Clark v. Dorsett

Clark and Allman were complainants and filed a bill in the chancery court to reform a deed to certain timber on lands described in the deed given as being on lot 2 of a certain section, township, and range, but that by a mistake mutual between the grantor and the grantee in the timber deed the property was described as lot 2 when it should be, and was intended to be, lot 4 of said section, township, and range.

It was alleged that Dorsett, after the giving' of this timber deed and with actual notice of the complainants’ right, took a deed of trust upon the land including the timber described as…