Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Linden Clement and Donald Clem Lohman, Jr., No. 74-1436 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1974No. 921Published

1Opinion of the Court

504 F.2d 921

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Charles Linden CLEMENT and Donald Clem Lohman, Jr.,

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 74-1436 Summary Calendar.*

*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc.

v.

Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431

F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 9, 1974.

J. V. Eskenazi, Federal Public Defender, Theodore J. Sakowitz, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants.

Robert W. Rust, U.S. Atty., Kerry J. Nahoom, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Patricia Louise Moody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Manuel Rivas CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. ClementCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API