Legal Opinion

United States v. Clement

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1974No. 74-1436PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

In this narcotics case the district judge explained to the jury that the term “rip-off”, used by the defendants’ attorney in referring to their attitude toward actions of codefendants, was limited — to the judge’s knowledge — to use in a narcotics context. We take judicial notice of the fact that in ordinary speech the term “rip-off” is used to refer to any fraud, confidence game, or deceitful overreaching by one person of another or of others. In the circumstances of this case, the evidence of guilt was far from overwhelming. The error therefore was not harmless. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Patricia Louise Moody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Manuel Rivas CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael R. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  2. Moton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. United States v. Charles Linden Clement and Donald Clem Lohman, Jr., No. 74-1436 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API