Legal Opinion

State v. Nakanelua

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 2014No. Nos. 30444, 30568, CAAP-10-0000166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAMURA, Chief Judge.

These consolidated appeals stem from a dispute between government employers and a government-employee union regarding the process of selecting a neutral arbitrator after an impasse was reached in the parties’ renegotiation of their collective bargaining agreement (CBA) for a new term. The type of arbitration involved in this ease, known as *496“interest arbitration,”3 is designed to determine the terms of the parties’ CBA when the parties cannot come to an agreement and an impasse is reached. The use of arbitration to resolve the impasse in this case…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Mount St. Mary's Hospital v. CatherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kaho'ohanohano v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NakaneluaHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Nakaneula.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API