Florida Greenheart Corp. v. Gautier
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentErvin, Justice
(dissenting) :
My study of the authorities leads me to the conclusion that we should affirm the decision of the chancellor. Furthermore, from a consideration of the evidence I agree with the chancellor and the appellees that many of the greenheart timbers on appellant’s storage yard were offered for sale and sold piecemeal to the general pub-*593lie. In reaching the conclusion we should affirm, I believe the rule announced in E. J. Stanton & Sons v. Los Angeles County, 78 Cal.App.2d 181, 177 P.2d 804, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 766, 68 S.Ct. 75, 92 L.Ed. 352, is correct that a shipment or cargo of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- May v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hinson v. LottSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Stanton & Sons v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Mexican Petroleum Corp. v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.