Legal Opinion
Stanton & Sons v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1947No. Civ. 15469, 15470, 15471PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question involved is whether respondent as importer had so treated certain taxed lumber as to incorporate it into the mass of property in this state thereby removing it from the inhibition of the federal Constitution against a state’s assessing duties on imports.
The three judgments appealed from resulted from three actions to recover taxes paid under protest on several lots of lumber in possession of respondent on the first Monday in March of 1939, of 1940, and of 1941, to H. L. Byram, the county tax collector of Los Angeles County who was on the date of each payment agent for the city of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Volkswagen Pacific, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Singer Co. v. County of KingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Craig Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- United States Plywood Corp. v. City of AlgomaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Ponce v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.