Legal Opinion
Golden Cycle Mining Co. v. Rapson Coal Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 1, 1911No. 3,342PublishedCited by 20 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. Action at law by the Rapson Coal Mining Company and the Curtis Coal Mining Company against the Golden Cycle Mining Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
On the 11th day of July, 1906, the Golden Cycle Mining Company, plaintiff in error, made and entered into a contract with the Rapson Coal Mining Company and the Curtis Coal Mining Company, defendants in error, which, so far as is material to the questions raised upon this record, was in the following language:
“This agreement, made and entered into this 11th day of July, 1906, by and between the Golden Cycle Mining Company, a West Virginia corporation doing business in the state of Colorado, and hereinafter called the Mining Company, party of the first part, and the Rapson Coal Mining Company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Whitebreast Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Bennecke v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Wells v. . AlexandreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bu-Vi-Bar Petroleum Corporation v. KrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Griffin v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Cohen v. Clayton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Conley Camera Co. v. Multiscope & Film Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.