Production Credit Ass'n of Green Bay v. Rosner
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentAbrahamson, J.
The parol evidence rule is applicable to bar prior written or oral agreements varying or contradicting a subsequent written agreement if the subsequent written agreement is intended by the parties to be the final expression of the agreement. (For a complete statement of the rule see note 1 of the majority opinion.) Thus when a party invokes the parol evidence rule the first step the trial court must take is to determine whether the parties intended the written agreement to be a final, total or partial, integrated agreement, or whether they intended any prior agreements to be part of their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. First Mortgage InvestorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Danielson v. Bank of ScandinaviaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Bunbury v. KraussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc. v. Securalloy CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.