Legal Opinion · Dissent

Production Credit Ass'n of Green Bay v. Rosner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1977No. 75-208Published

1DissentAbrahamson, J.

The parol evidence rule is applicable to bar prior written or oral agreements varying or contradicting a subsequent written agreement if the subsequent written agreement is intended by the parties to be the final expression of the agreement. (For a complete statement of the rule see note 1 of the majority opinion.) Thus when a party invokes the parol evidence rule the first step the trial court must take is to determine whether the parties intended the written agreement to be a final, total or partial, integrated agreement, or whether they intended any prior agreements to be part of their…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. First Mortgage InvestorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Danielson v. Bank of ScandinaviaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Bunbury v. KraussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc. v. Securalloy CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API