Legal Opinion

Stephens v. State Ex Rel. Goldsberry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1925No. 15710PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Tulsa county by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against plaintiffs in error, as defendants, to recovep the sum of $5,000 on a certain supersedeas bond for that amount, executed by R. L. Stephens, as principal, and M. A. Harrison and J. H. Berry, as sureties. The principal, Stephens, had been convicted on a charge of larceny and the bond sued on is the ordinary supersedeas bond given on appeal to the Criminal Court of Appeals. Defendants, appellants here, set up a number of defenses, but the only one which we deem it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte CrumpCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cloud v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Newton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Díaz Díaz v. Cándida Campos de CórdovaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
  4. Scott v. RainesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Addington v. State Ex Rel. PruetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API