Legal Opinion
United States v. Property Identified as Lot Numbered 718
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 24, 1997No. CIV. A. 96-2100-LFOPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Currently pending are plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and claimant’s Motion to Dismiss. The latter alleges that the United States failed to give claimant Kimberly Honesty notice and a hearing prior to “seizing” the defendant properties, in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause and United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property, 510 U.S. 43, 114 S.Ct. 492, 126 L.Ed.2d 490 (1993). The parties agree that the United States filed and served a complaint and a warrant on the properties in September 1996; that the United States…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. 9638 Chicago HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Carl and Mary Shelden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Segelstrom v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Conant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. Property Identified as Lot Numbered 718District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Price v. Automotive Finance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026