Legal Opinion
In re Boomerang Tube, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 29, 2016No. Case No. 15-11247 Jointly AdministeredPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION1
Mary F. Wálrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Before the Court are the Objections of the United States Trustee (the “UST”) to the Applications of Brown Rudnick LLP, and Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel LLP (“Committee Counsel”) as counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Committee”) of Boomerang Tube, LLC (the “Debtor”) because they include a provision indemnifying them for expenses incurred in any successful defense of their *71fees. For the reasons stated below, the Court will sustain the UST’s objection.
1. BACKGROUND
On June 9, 2015, the Debtor and its affiliates…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- James L. McCoy Administrator of the Electrical Workers Trust Funds, Etc. v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- In Re Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. Kirkpatrick & LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Stephen J. McdonaldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re RoseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
- In re Hungry Horse, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- In re John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- In re Capitol Litho Printing Corp. - Chapter 11United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- In re: Ervin E. RoseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.