Legal Opinion
Citibank, N.A. v. Data Lease Financial Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 2, 1988No. 78-5747-CIVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
NESBITT, District Judge.
This cause is before the court for jury trial and on pending motions after remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. See Citibank, N.A. v. Data Lease Financial Corp., 828 F.2d 686 (11th Cir.1987). The court specially set this case for jury trial commencing November 28, 1988. Although the court selected a jury as scheduled and expected to proceed to trial, for the reasons stated below and by stipulation of the parties, the motion to dismiss is dispositive of all issues triable to a jury.
Because the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Loran W. Robbins, and Allen M. DorfmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Citibank, N. A. v. Data Lease Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Citibank, N.A. v. Data Lease Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Ladonna Harrison v. Edison Brothers Apparel Stores, Incorporated, and Melvin Wall, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Harrison v. Edison Bros. Apparel Stores, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
- Citibank, N.A. v. Data Lease Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- Citibank, N.A., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Data Lease Financial Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Miami National Bank, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990