Legal Opinion

United States v. City of Miami

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1980No. 77-1856PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge.

Today we have before us a pair of cases involving the interrelationship of “reverse discrimination,” affirmative action, and the principles governing consent decrees. In this case, along with the companion case of United States v. City of Alexandria, 614 F.2d 1358 (5th Cir. 1980), we are faced with novel and difficult issues concerning consent decrees negotiated between the federal government and representatives of local governments settling suits alleging a “pattern or practice” of employment discrimination. We hold here that the district court acted properly in…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Anago Franchising, Inc. v. SHAZ, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1707, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,668 Gloria Holmes v. Continental Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API