Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Southern Pacific Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

This is an action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff while riding in an automobile driven by her husband. The plaintiff recovered in the trial court and the defendant Southern Pacific Company appeals.

For convenience, in this opinion we will refer to the Southern Pacific Company as the defendant.

The facts disclose that the automobile in which plaintiff was riding, traveling north on the ScioLebanon County Road, was driven into the nineteenth car of defendant’s train as it was proceeding slowly in an easterly direction over a grade crossing which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Russell v. Oregon R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Doty v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Finn v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Case v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Poole v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Still v. Hampton and Branchville RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  4. Murphy v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Brown v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API