Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Slosson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1890Published

Error to Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Cahill; J.

Stevens & Farrar, a firm doing a general hardware business at Evart, Mich., made a general assignment for the benefit of their creditors on February 8, *5441890, to the plaintiff, who, with his brother, were bankers at Evart, under the name of Wolf Bros. No question' is made of the regularity and strict compliance with the provisions of the statute of all the assignment proceedings on their face, including the filing of the bond, notice to the creditors, etc.

On February 1, 1890, Stevens & Farrar, claiming to be indebted to Wolf Bros, in the sum of $500, gave them a chattel mortgage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kendall v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Fuller v. HasbrouckMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Coots v. RadfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API