Legal Opinion

Ralston Steel Car Co. v. Ralston

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1925No. 18815PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

Permanent leaseholds have become so numerous in all the large cities of Ohio that the question is one of tremendous public interest, yet that fact has no bearing upon the legal questions involved. The legal question is purely one of statutory interpretation. Dower is a creature of statute and the controversy therefore turns upon the meaning and intent of Section 8606, General Code:

“A widow or widower, who has not relinquished or been barred of it, shall be endowed of an estate for life in one-third of all the real property of .which the deceased consort was seized as an estate of inheritance…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Welfare Federation v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Williams v. WattWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. King v. WhiteWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Freedline v. CielenskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Sanitary District of Chicago v. ManasseIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API