Haynes v. Arnold

1. Even if tender was properly alleged in this case, the evidence was conflicting, and the court was authorized to find against the petitioner.

2. The court was also authorized to And against the plaintiff on his contention that the property sold at sheriff’s sale was not offered and sold before the court-house door between the legal hours of sale on the day upon which it was advertised to be sold, the evidence upon this question being conflicting.

3. In the brief of counsel for the plaintiff it is contended that the judgment upon which the fi. fa. levied upon the property was based was illegal…