Legal Opinion
Heist v. Dunlap Company
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 11, 1942No. 13994PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beid, Chief Justice.
The terms, “once a week for four weeks,” “for four weeks,” and “four weeks notice . . once a week for four weeks,” are commonly used in security deeds in prescribing the amount of advertisement that is to be made in the execution of the power of sale vested in the grantee upon default in payment of the debt by the grantor. These terms are also found in many of our statutes prescribing publication of notices by sheriffs, ordinaries, fiduciaries, and others of sales, etc. See Code, §§ 39-1101, 49-112, 49-204, 49-314, 63-211, 85-1511, 94-102, 94-202, 94-206. In § 39-1102, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Albertina Realty Co. v. Rosbro Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Moore v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Conley v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Park v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc. v. Imaging Systems InternationalSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- 4518 S. 256th, LLC v. Karen L. Gibbon, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Verner v. McLartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Tondreau v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of N. Y. v. BarronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.