DeMay v. Carper
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.
The plaintiffs below, now appellants, having been given by the jury what they consider to be inadequate verdicts in a personal injury case, seek reversals on the ground that counsel for the defendant made prejudicial remarks in his opening statement.
Suit was brought by Joseph DeMay, who was then eighteen, for “serious, painful and permanent injuries” to his limbs and body and “his nerves and nervous system,” and by his father (for loss of services and reimbursement of medical expenses) against the driver of a car that ran into the rear of the parked car in which Joseph was sitting.
Counsel for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nelson v. SeilerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Brooks v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Esterline v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Leach v. MetzgerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Bailey v. WrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. PlewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Tierco Maryland, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Mayor of Federalsburg v. Allied Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Goldberg v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Kelch v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.