Legal Opinion

O'Reilly v. Hoover

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1908No. 12,995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Edward P. Holmes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Hastings, C.

The sole error urged in the argument of this case is that the damages assessed by the jury in the district conrt in favor of the plaintiff in the original action are entirely inadequate. In the brief on file are some other complaints as to error in giving instructions and in the admission of evidence. The instructions complained of do not, however, affect the question of the amount of damages, nor does the evidence, errors as to the admission of which are complained of; and the question of the plaintiff’s right of recovery having been found in his favor by the jury, error in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ellsworth v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Emmons v. SheldonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Gann v. WormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Sharpe v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Walden v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Law v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Langdon v. ClarkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Blakely v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Norton v. Lincoln Traction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API