Legal Opinion

Gertz v. Estes

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 2008No. 64A04-0708-CV-441PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellants-Defendants David and Nic-helle Gertz (“David and Nichelle”) appeal the trial court’s order that they remove their fence. We affirm.

Issues

David and Nichelle raise two issues on appeal, which we re-order and re-state as follows:

I. Whether the trial court erred in applying the “spite fence” statute because David and Nichelle had obtained a local permit for the fence; and

II. Whether the trial court clearly erred in making its findings.

Facts and Procedural History

Appellees-Plaintiffs Douglas and Susan Estes (“Douglas and Susan”) resided in Hebron, with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. LinkAmerica Corp. v. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Infinity Products, Inc. v. QuandtIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wernke v. HalasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Horseman v. KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Obolensky v. TrombleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. ALBERINO v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. Gertz v. EstesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. ALBERINO v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API