Gertz v. Estes
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellants-Defendants David and Nic-helle Gertz (“David and Nichelle”) appeal the trial court’s order that they remove their fence. We affirm.
Issues
David and Nichelle raise two issues on appeal, which we re-order and re-state as follows:
I. Whether the trial court erred in applying the “spite fence” statute because David and Nichelle had obtained a local permit for the fence; and
II. Whether the trial court clearly erred in making its findings.
Facts and Procedural History
Appellees-Plaintiffs Douglas and Susan Estes (“Douglas and Susan”) resided in Hebron, with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- LinkAmerica Corp. v. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Infinity Products, Inc. v. QuandtIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Wernke v. HalasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Horseman v. KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Obolensky v. TrombleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- ALBERINO v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Gertz v. EstesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- ALBERINO v. BalchSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008