Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 2005No. 79A02-0408-PC-649PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In 1996, a jury found Ernest T. Smith guilty of Murder and Robbery, as a Class B felony, and the trial court sentenced him to a total of sixty years. Our supreme court affirmed Smith's convictions on direct appeal. See Smith v. State, 702 N.E.2d 668 (Ind.1998). In September 1999, Smith filed his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief. In October 1999, the post-conviction relief ("PCR") court ordered the parties to present evidence by way of affidavits under Indiana Post-Con-In July 2003, Smith viction Rule 1(9)(b). filed his amended PCR petition and moved…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Chappell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lyles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- David Pannell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- John R. Myers II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.