Legal Opinion

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 11, 1962No. Nos. 15414, 15415PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.

On May 19, 1960, this court agreed with the order of the Civil Aeronautics Board awarding New York-San Francisco non-stop service to American Airlines, Inc. [intervenor], but remanded the cases to the Board “for the limited purpose of holding a hearing to determine, with all convenient speed, the relevant facts on the question of whether the Board’s rules were so violated as to require a setting aside of the order.” United Air Lines, Inc. v. C. A. B., 108 U.S.App.D.C. 220, 225, 281 F.2d 53, 58 (1960). The order of remand reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

“On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sangamon Valley Television Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  2. WKAT, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  3. Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  4. Sangamon Valley Television Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  5. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. Havlish v. Taliban; Aliganga v. TalibanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API