Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.
On May 8, 1959, on remand from the Supreme Court.1 we vacated the Commission’s order released March 1, 1957. We held that “private approaches to the *743members of the Commission vitiated its action and the proceeding must be reopened.” Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States and Federal Communications Commission, 106 U.S.App.D. C. 30, 33, 269 F.2d 221, 224. We did not order an entirely new proceeding but remanded the case to the Commission with instructions to hold, with the aid of a specially appointed examiner, an evidential hearing to determine the nature and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sangamon Valley Television Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Angels Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Fidelity Television, Inc., Rko General, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Sangamon Valley Television Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Fort Harrison Telecasting Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.