Legal Opinion
Michelle Hussey, James Hussey, Mary Fran Mathis, John Rutherford, and Teresa Rutherford v. City of Portland, a Municipal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 18, 1995No. 93-35641PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed January 19, 1995 is withdrawn. With the memorandum disposition withdrawn, the Petition for Rehearing and the Motion to Certify Questions of State Law to the Oregon Supreme Court are moot.
OPINION
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the City of Portland’s ordinance requiring non-residents to consent to annexation as a condition of receiving a subsidy, or reduction in hook-up costs, for mandated sewer connections, violates their federal constitutional rights to free speech or equal protection.
Michelle and James Hussey along with several of their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Shook v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Jerry Rubin v. City of Santa Monica Maria M. Stewart, City Clerk Does 1-5, Inclusive, Bill Jones, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Green v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Weber v. ShelleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Michael Chamness v. Abel MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.