Legal Opinion

Trotta v. Pono

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 27, 1976No. 74-307-AppealPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaolino, J.

The principal question raised by this appeal is whether the public policy of this state is violated by a provision in an automobile insurance policy which provides that the mailing of a notice of cancellation to the named insured at the address shown in the policy is sufficient proof of notice of cancellation.

The plaintiff, Pasco Trotta, brought a civil action against defendant, Elizabeth D. Pono, for damages allegedly suffered as a result of a motor vehicle accident on August 22, 1970. The defendant’s insurance company refused to defend the action against her and therefore she brought a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Donarski v. LardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Koehn v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Blomquist v. Grays Harbor Medical Service Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Capuano v. Kemper Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  2. Sparling v. BizierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  3. Rollins Hudig Hall of Rhode Island, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API