Legal Opinion

Farmers Trust Co., Excr. v. Wilson Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1948No. Appeals, 213 and 251PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

These appeals are from a judgment in ejectment entered on the pleadings, the relevant facts of the case not being in dispute. The question of law involved is whether the testatrix intended a devise in remainder to her heirs at law to go to such persons only as would be her heirs according to the law as it existed at the time of the execution of her will or such as were her heirs under the law in force at the date of her death. The learned court below took the latter view and entered judgment accordingly. The circumstances in which the question arises are as follows.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kiebler v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Tatham's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Rosengarten EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Buzby's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  5. Whiteside's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Houston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. McFerren EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Collins EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Brown EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Pearson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API