Easley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the sale of heroin, with the punishment assessed by the jury at 35 years’ confinement.
Appellant’s first ground of error complains that, “The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial because the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict.”
The evidence discloses that Jerry Rangel was an undercover agent for the San Antonio Police Department. He testified that on the date alleged in the indictment he purchased a capsule of heroin from the appellant for the sum of $3.25. He further testified that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Aguero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Criswell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chappell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Mills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Stanley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.