Legal Opinion

Chappell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1975No. 48820-48822PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ON APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO REINSTATE THE APPEAL

ROBERTS, Judge.

The appellants were convicted of the offense of murder with malice, and were given the death penalty. Sentence was later commuted to imprisonment for life.

This appeal was originally dismissed because the record did not reflect proper notice of appeal. Such a showing now having been made, we will discuss the merits of the appeal.

Counsel for each appellant has filed a separate brief. Appellant Chappell’s brief consists of one-hundred and eighteen pages raising twenty-three grounds of error. Appellant Twine’s original brief…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Tezeno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Henriksen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Cherry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Creel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Kunkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API