Legal Opinion

(PC) Washington v. Castillo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 16, 2023No. 1:23-cv-01095Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01095-JLT-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER 13 v. (Doc. 1) 14 A. CASTILLO, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT 20 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 21 governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 22 The…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API