Legal Opinion

Beckerman v. Pinkas

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 26, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWelsh, P.J.

This is a civil action pursuant to the Brookline Rent and Eviction Control By-law1, in which the plaintiff (hereinafter, the tenant) seeks to recover rent paid to the defendant (hereinafter, the landlord) for a rental unit not authorized by the Brookline Rent Control Board, plus damages of up to three times the amount of rent charged for said unit2 plus attorney’s fees.

The landlord in his answer denied the allegations of the complaint.

The trial court found for the tenant and awarded damages of $6,350.00 plus interest and costs.3

The evidence introduced at trial tended to show the following:

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Inhabitants of Worcester v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  3. Town Planning & Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Amesbury Specialty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Bernhardt v. Atlantic Finance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Martinelli v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pion v. PezzaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API