Legal Opinion

Pion v. Pezza

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 14, 1985Published

1Dissent 1

Dissenting Opinion

2Dissent · ShubowShubow, J.

With great reluctance, I dissent. The reluctance arises from the fact that I concede one reading of the recent case Bushnell v. Bushnell, 393 Mass. 462 (1984), could justify, if not mandate, the result reached by the court. But I suggest that the court’s reading results in ignoring the following factual outcome which unmistakably emerges from an otherwise clouded Record.

The parties entered into an agreement to purchase a lot of land for $13,000. The plaintiffs on separate occasions paid the defendants sums totalling $7,120 (which the trial judge sometimes characterizes as a…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moulton v. Brookline Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Beckerman v. PinkasMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Peach v. CommonwealthMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API