Legal Opinion

J. A. Dougherty's Sons, Inc. v. Dougherty

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1940No. 800PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

The plaintiff corporation has instituted this action to obtain injunctive protection and other relief against the allegedly unlawful use of the word “Dougherty’s” by the defendant in the sale of whiskey. The defendant denies violation of any rights of the plaintiff and requests affirmative relief in the form of a decree restraining the plaintiff from interfering with his business, a decision defining all the rights of the parties, an award of damages, and an accounting of profits.

I make the following special

Findings of Fact

1. The plaintiff is a corporation organized and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Vick Medicine Co. v. Vick Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
  4. De Nobili Cigar Co. v. Nobile Cigar Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
  5. R. B. Davis Co. v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caesars World, Inc. v. Caesar's PalaceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  2. Winfield v. CharlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. MacSweeney Enterprises, Inc. v. TarantinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Morse-Starrett Products Co. v. StecconeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1949
  5. King Pharr Canning Operations, Inc. v. Pharr Canning Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API