State Ex Rel. Cyr v. Long
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.
This is an intrusion into office suit. It is brought under the provisions of sections 2593, 2594 and 2597 of the Revised Statutes of Louisiana, as amended by Act No. 102 of 1928. The pleadings consist of relator’s original and supplemental petitions, to which respondent filed three exceptions and a plea of estoppel. He thereafter pleaded the unconstitutionality of Act No. 102 of 1928.
The issues presented can be briefly stated, but, in this case, we think the pleadings should be quoted in full. The relator’s original and supplemental petitions and respondent’s exceptions and pleas follow in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Ableman v. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Olson v. LangerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934