Legal Opinion
Faulkenstein v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 1999No. 97-AA-1868PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Petitioner challenges the decision of the District of Columbia Board of Medicine (the “Board”) revoking his license to practice acupuncture in the District of Columbia. See D.C.Code § 2-3305.14 (1994). The Board found six separate, but partly overlapping, grounds for revocation under § 2-3305.14(a). These included, most notably, professional incompetence for failure to meet the educational and training requirements for licen-sure (subsection (a)(5)); fraudulently and deceptively using a license (subsection (a)(2)); discipline by a licensing authority of another…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Eilers v. District of Columbia Bureau of Motor Vehicles ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hutchinson v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Superior Beverages, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Williamson v. District of Columbia Board of DentistryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Khan v. State Board of Auctioneer ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re DittonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Johnson v. District of Columbia, Department of HealthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Johnson v. District of Columbia, Department of HealthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Khan v. State Board of Auctioneer ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.