Legal Opinion

Howard v. Aspen Way Enterprises, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2017No. S-17-0072; S-17-0073; S-17-0074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶1] Gretchen Howard, Audrey Kinion, and Steve Winn (Plaintiffs) individually filed separate claims in circuit court asserting invasion of privacy claims against Aspen Way Enterprises, Inc. (Aspen Way). The circuit court concluded that Wyoming does not recognize a cause of action for Plaintiffs’ privacy claims and granted Aspen Way summary judgment on those claims. Plaintiffs appealed, and the district court affirmed on the same basis. We granted the Plaintiffs’ petitions for writ of review, consolidated their petitions, and now reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lyle L. Williams v. State of Wyoming ex rel., University of Wyoming Board of TrusteesWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Bextel v. BrynerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. Credit Sage LLC v. Credit Wellness LLCDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API