Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Stringfellow
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 13, 1939No. Record No. 2133PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Under review is an order correcting what was held to be an erroneous assessment of omitted additional State taxes for the years 1934, 1935, and 1936. This additional assessment came about in this manner:
Scott & Stringfellow are stockbrokers in the city of Richmond. They buy and sell stock for their customers and transact such business as is usually incident to that calling. Among these customers was Mr. Blair B. Stringfellow, who for many years maintained an open account with these brokers. This account was made up of money deposited, proceeds from the sale of stocks and bonds, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hunton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
- South East Public Service Corp. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- County of Sussex v. JarrattSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Commonwealth v. HutzlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- City of Norfolk v. BellCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Almond v. GilmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Miller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Commonwealth v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- City of Roanoke v. James W. Michael's Bakery Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- East Coast Freight Lines v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.