Legal Opinion
Harris v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 13, 2021No. 4:21-cv-09570Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEVIN JEROME HARRIS JR., Case No. 21-cv-09570-JCS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 9 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 10 TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., et al., COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 2 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Kevin Jerome Harris Jr., pro se, applies to proceed in forma pauperis. See dkt. 2. 15 Sufficient cause having been shown, that application is GRANTED. 16 The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Harris’s complaint against…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.