Legal Opinion
Hawaii v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 2002No. 00-15278; D.C. No. CV-99-00810-ACKPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Samson L. Brown appeals pro se the district court’s sua sponte order remanding Brown’s traffic court action to state court and its order denying reconsideration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). See Ashland v. Cooper, 863 F.2d 691, 692 n. 2 (9th Cir.1988). We review de novo a district court’s decision to remand a removed case, Nebraska ex rel. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. v. Bentson, 146 F.3d 676, 678 (9th Cir.1998), and for an abuse of discretion the denial of a motion for reconsideration, Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- California v. SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- State of Nebraska, Ex Rel., Department of Social Services Internal Revenue Service v. David A. BentsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- City of Ashland, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Mark Cooper, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and Ron Salter, Counter-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988